So I have been studying about loudness and loudness meters, and LUFS and all that stuff and even have the meters (IK Mastering Console, ToneBoosters EU Levels Meters, etc.) But I am still confused.
They keep talking about -24 LUFS being "the norm" for broadcast and even have screen shots. (See below)
But when I run any modern song through one of these--Let's say Glen Campbell's latest--just to be on the "milder side", it is WAY out of that -24 range and totally in the red.
The only tune I could find in my library that shows up as -24 LUFS is an Audrey Hepburn tune Moon River from that old movie and that is just kind of a thin blue strip of a .wav, hardly what you see today. I.E. it is SOFT.
So, I guess my question is how are you you supposed to master at -24 LUFS and get anything anywhere near modern sounds if Audrey Hepburn is the reference?
Here are the charts from an acoustic song I am about to post that goes to -24 sometimes, but is mostly at -15. (LUFS). It has a nice, well balanced acoustic sound.
Is it necessary to force it to never go above -24 and if so under what circumstances??
Also, is that a tool you can use to "gate" it at that level and normalize to LUFS (the broadcasters must have one) and if so, what is that tool. I know how to limit or gate in dbs, but this seems to be talking about a completely different standard.
Thanks!!
(See attachment LUFS 1 as well).
David Snyder Songwriter/Renaissance Man Studio + Fingers
I KNEW you were going to say that Herb. I KNEW it.
Yes, my wife Gayle sings it in our repertoire and I have it for us to practice. Also, I happen like it myself. I also like Judy Garland singing Somewhere over the Rainbow if you don't mind.
Thanks for the feedback on the question.
Catch you later.
David Snyder Songwriter/Renaissance Man Studio + Fingers
Thank you for posting this. I have never stumbled across LUFS before and since your post, I've been doing a bit of homework. It's definitely something worth getting a handle on.
I found the below video by Ian Shepherd an excellent presentation on understanding how peak, RMS, integrated loudness and LUFS correlate. The video is 19 minutes long and it was time really well spent.
From the Youtube clip, it seems that many of today's songs will have a LUFS around -11. Since, according to the video, -23 integrated loudness is the required value for broadcasting, a piece of music that has an engineered value of -11 will be turned down by 12dB (the difference between -11 and -23) at the time of broadcasting.
As a comparison, the video clip also says that a piece of classical music that has an integrated loudness of less than -23 will be lifted up to -23 at broadcasting.
My overall, still-early-days-novice take on this is that the -24 LUFS that you mention is not necessarily an audio level that sound engineers strive to achieve when mixing and mastering, it's what they strive to achieve when adjusting audio for broadcasting as radio or TV.
What are you feeding into the meter? If you have movie sound tracks I'm thinking you are using digitized media of some type and there's no way to know how the audio is already compressed. Without a reference tone for each recording you feed the meter, there's simply no way to know the provenance of the audio.
Yes Noel there is quite a lot to learn. I will write more later, but your post is spot on--except I think they are taking more about the news standard of "loudness unit" gating and not db reduction, per se. But your numbers are accurate in the RMS realm, and I guess we leave it up to broadcasters to do their thing should we get so lucky.
There is SO much to learn. If you click on the attachment on the first post you will see a meter strip that is very helpful to me to improve dynamics, presence, and perceived loudness. I am learning from engineers that you have to set the vocals precisely first, then gradually add in other stuff, keeping an eye on ALL meters, to see which instrument suddenly flips the switch and throws the mix out of whack. It can be as simple as a bright acoustic pushed too high--or anything. One misstep and you lose control of the dynamics.
Quite fascinating actually.
David Snyder Songwriter/Renaissance Man Studio + Fingers
You are absolutely right. I was just talking about overall loudness, really, and how many different standards there are now for what is loud, and how many "numbers" are supposed to be the ruling number.
I think Noel's reply cut to the core--but I still have much more reading and experimenting to do.
Thanks for the reply.
David Snyder Songwriter/Renaissance Man Studio + Fingers
It's excellent and has both VU scales as well as graphs (which I like). It's completely free and comes bundled with a pot-potpourri of plugins that are a mixture of free and limited trial. When installing, it's not necessary to install all plugins. It's possible to simply choose those that are of interest. (I only selected the Loudness Analyzer.)
I can tell that this journey is going to be exciting! I look forward to where it takes me. If I come across anything really eye/ear-opening, I'll post it in this thread.
Just recently I found out a little more about LUFS...
According to sound enthusiasts and sound engineers on the 'net, these days it seems that Youtube, iTunes, Spotify are making use of LUFS when it comes to processing audio uploads. The values give are usually in the vicinity of
Youtube = -14 LUFS
Spotify = -12 LUFS
iTunes = -16 LUFS
While -23 LUFS is the level agreed on for radio broadcasting, for user audio preparation, the rule of thumb is that the value with the greatest negative magnitude will have most dynamics and the value with the lowest negative magnitude will have a more compressed/limited sound (i.e. -16 LUFS will offer more dynamics in the performance than -10 LUFS). This is additional to any compression or limiting that is present in the pre-LUFS-adjusted track.
The below article offers some insight into various settings.
The good news is that it's not necessary to understand how LUFS works to be able to use it. All that is required is to...
Determine what suitable LUFS value the audio should be adjusted to (e.g -14).
Adjust it to that value.
It is not necessary to adjust a track to the broadcast value of -23. Should a track be picked up for broadcasting, the studio will adjust the track's level accordingly.
When using Soundcloud (which doesn't seem to optimise uploaded audios), if all tracks are adjusted to near the same LUFS value, the tracks will sound relatively uniform. Thus, as a listener plays through the tracks, they will not need to adjust the volume control excessively.
Generate Lyrics for your Band-in-a-Box songs with LyricLab!
Need some lyrics to complete your Band-in-a-Box song? LyricLab is here to help!
LyricLab (by Joanne Cooper) is an AI-powered tool designed to quickly create lyrics and chords to fit your music. Just enter a rough idea of your lyrics, and let the AI bring them to life. Once you're happy with the results, simply import the LyricLab file into Band-in-a-Box® 2024 or newer. From there, you can pick your style and generate melodies to match your song’s chords!
Ci siamo dati da fare e abbiamo aggiunto oltre 50 nuove funzionalità e una straordinaria raccolta di nuovi contenuti, tra cui 222 RealTracks, nuovi RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 3, Playable RealDrums Set 2, due nuovi set di "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 e altro ancora!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK & 7, Xtra Styles PAK 17 & 18, und mehr!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 apporte plus de 50 fonctions nouvelles ainsi qu'une importante de contenus nouveaux à savoir : 222 RealTracks, des RealStyles nouveaux, des SuperTracks MIDI, des Etudes d'Instruments, des Prestations d'Artistes, des "Morceaux avec Choeurs", un Set 3 de Tracks Jouables, un Set 2 de RealDrums Jouables, deux nouveaux Sets de "RealDrums Stems", des Styles XPro PAK 6 & 7, des Xtra Styles PAK 17 & 18, et bien plus encore!
New! XPro Styles PAK 7 for Band-in-a-Box 2024 for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 7 with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 50 RealTracks and RealDrums that are sure to delight!
With XPro Styles PAK 7 you can expect 25 rock & pop, 25 jazz, and 25 country styles, as well as 25 of this year's wildcard genre: Celtic!
Here's a small sampling of what XPro Styles PAK 7 has to offer: energetic rock jigs, New Orleans funk, lilting jazz waltzes, fast Celtic punk, uptempo train beats, gritty grunge, intense jazz rock, groovy EDM, soulful R&B, soft singer-songwriter pop, country blues rock, and many more!
Special Pricing! Until September 30, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 7 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea)! Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box 2024® with XPro Styles PAK 7! Order now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2024 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box 2024 for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box version 2024 is here with 200 brand new styles to take for a spin!
Along with 50 new styles each for the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, we’ve put together a collection of styles using sounds from the SynthMaster plugin!
In this PAK you'll find: dubby reggae grooves, rootsy Americana, LA jazz pop, driving pop rock, mellow electronica, modern jazz fusion, spacey country ballads, Motown shuffles, energetic EDM, and plenty of synth heavy grooves! Xtra Style PAK 18 features these styles and many, many more!
Special Pricing! Until September 30, 2024, all the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 18 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea)! Expand your Band-in-a-Box 2024® library with Xtra Styles PAK 18! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 18 here.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 18 requires the 2024 UltraPAK/UltraPAK+/Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box 2024 for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box version 2024 is here with 200 brand new styles to take for a spin!
Along with 50 new styles each for the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, we’ve put together a collection of styles using sounds from the SynthMaster plugin!
In this PAK you'll find: dubby reggae grooves, rootsy Americana, LA jazz pop, driving pop rock, mellow electronica, modern jazz fusion, spacey country ballads, Motown shuffles, energetic EDM, and plenty of synth heavy grooves! Xtra Style PAK 18 features these styles and many, many more!
Special Pricing! Until September 30, 2024, all the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 18 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea)! Expand your Band-in-a-Box 2024® library with Xtra Styles PAK 18! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 18 here.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 18 requires the 2024 UltraPAK/UltraPAK+/Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean