|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,017
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,017 |
I spend hours sometimes trying to isolate and accurately report issues and nothing changes
I think I can't do this any more. You and me both brother!
BIAB – 2025, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, 1TB WD Black NVMe SSD, 2TB WDC Blue SSD, 1TB WD Blue, 2 TB SK NVMe, 6 TB External, Motu Audio Express 6x6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
The Plugin is up to 6 now and still don't work ... Hate to cherry pick a comment, and I only allow myself one or two really dark negative postings here in the forum a month, but I could not pass this one up. I just have to remind you all that the 6 stands for 6 ficken years of this! So if this is the future of BIAB, count me out. And after 6 ficken years my energy and enthusiasm has dropped 60% while the Plugin has gone nowhere but other developers have advanced with great software/iPad and Plugins and RealTracks Live Arranger keyboards and modules, because they listened. But PG... "They would not listen, they're not listening still
Perhaps they never will"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
Everyone seems to have a DAW that they like and use.
ALL the Reaper examples are because I CAN open an SGU directly in Reaper I CAN'T DO THAT WITH ANY OTHER DAW ON THE PLANET EARTH !
The whole idea of the PLUGIN is get the generate code out of the old delphi into JUCE C++ while cleaning up all the old limitations that hold it back, into ANY WIN, LIN, MAC DAW, iPad or Android.
This will give the same as I demo in that nasty horrible Reaper in your favorite DAW.
Wake up guys, other developers are writing it on the wall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,699
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,699 |
I spend hours sometimes trying to isolate and accurately report issues and nothing changes
I think I can't do this any more. You and me both brother! Nowadays I dunno which is more tiresome...yearly BIAB updates that never quite get finished or the incessant droning about Reaper and C++ and old guard and on and on and on. If I were PGM I'd have probably closed this forum, cleared the decks and required everyone interested to sign up again with new guidelines for conversations! I guess that's why I don't have a forum!  FWIW, I think the BIAB White Paper idea is a good one and the contributors have done something positive with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
Forget Reaper Derangement Syndrome you will now have Logic Derangement Syndrome look out guys it's gonna getcha ! I'm gonna start posting lots of Logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,001
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,001 |
Forget Reaper Derangement Syndrome you will now have Logic Derangement Syndrome look out guys it's gonna getcha ! I'm gonna start posting lots of Logic. I like this concept! Additions like this to BiaB would be fantastic.
Unclear if the pianist is a total beginner or a professional jazz player?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,847
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,847 |
A quick comparison of music tools that have chord tracks. I only show this to promote a normalization of terms and paradigms. Although you may not have thought of it this way, but BIAB was the first tool to have a Chord track where musicians followed it. Now there's more competition in that space. Session players Is a good name for a musician playing a particular instrument. I've always thought that BIAB should use that analogy more predominantly. It has recorded over 100 real musicians playing in thousands of instrument styles/phrases. It would help the company and new users to think of it that way as opposed to made-up terms such as real tracks, real drums or super midi tracks. Logic pro is the first in the industry to have machine learning session players where in contrast BIAB has recorded live session players for two decades. Rather than having a never-ending database of tens of thousands of styles to weed through, let the customers think more about the instruments that they want to use track by track to create their style. BIAB styles are a good starting point for people looking for a traditional sound. However, I see the industry, thus customers, focusing more on Instruments and Session players for their next track. This would cause a pivot in the Hierarchy with more emphasis on the Instrument and style of playing it (swing/shuffle / tempo / note duration, syncopation, pushes, emphases, in pocket/ahead of pocket) but could greatly improve the process of creating music if done clean and proper. Food for thought... ![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/5tbNY4KX/Chord-Tracks.jpg)
Studio One (latest version), Win 11 23H2 , i9 -10940X 3.3 GHz, 32GB Mem, a 4K 40" monitor, PreSonus Studio Live III Console as interface/controller. secondarily test on Reaper, Cakewalk, and S1 on Surface Pro 3 Win 10 (latest versions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
More LDS: The Logic Chord trackIn a Logic Pro project, you can access the Chord track in the global tracks. You can add chords to the Chord track and have all the Session Players in the project follow them, playing in sync with each other. You can add chord progressions to the Chord track, and create chord groups that you can copy or loop to reuse the same sequence of chords in different parts of the project. ![[Linked Image from help.apple.com]](https://help.apple.com/assets/654E7F8CD472768668095520/654E7F9560B6B45E960FE823/en_US/4b8b75d238730dfcabb7e45375cb97d7.png) Region chordsSession Player regions can contain region chords. You can add and edit region chords, and you can choose a chord progression for a Session Player region. When a Session Player region contains region chords, it follows those region chords rather than the chords on the Chord track. You can also have a Session Player region follow the Chord track instead of its region chords. You can copy and paste chords between regions, paste chords from the Chord track to a region, and paste region chords to the Chord track. ![[Linked Image from help.apple.com]](https://help.apple.com/assets/654E7F8CD472768668095520/654E7F9560B6B45E960FE823/en_US/8448760068170c989d5cec32ed9c75d4.png)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 19,686
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 19,686 |
Everyone seems to have a DAW that they like and use.
ALL the Reaper examples are because I CAN open an SGU directly in Reaper I CAN'T DO THAT WITH ANY OTHER DAW ON THE PLANET EARTH ! I suspect that this is actually not correct. Have you ever tried opening an SGU song in RealBand?
BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 825
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 825 |
Logic pro is the first in the industry to have machine learning session players where in contrast BIAB has recorded live session players for two decades.
Rather than having a never-ending database of tens of thousands of styles to weed through, let the customers think more about the instruments that they want to use track by track to create their style. +1 Logic’s session players are pretty amazing. Would love to have some of those features in BIAB. Too many BIAB styles. Overwhelming. The ability to significantly modify the players instead is a nice approach. Logic’s session musicians sound like real players, NOT midi musicians. Arm them with high quality sound modules (ToonTrack, NI, etc) and you have something that sounds very much like BIAB real tracks. That is worth checking out. If and when AAPL delivers a set of basic styles and a better chord entry interface it will have a serious contender to BIAB. Its not there yet,imo.
Last edited by mrgeeze; 06/04/24 06:22 AM.
biab2024(Mac) Latest Build
Mac OS Sequoia 15.0.1
Apple M2 pro 32GB Ram
Logic Pro 11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
I have spent so much time here trying hard to improve things while other software now seems to be way ahead in the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,790 |
What I have been saying is that there are too many "different" instruments. Rather than listing something as a "Clean Electric Guitar" it should be "Fender Electric Guitar" "Telecaster Electric Guitar" they should all be recorded "DI" on the same instrument, same levels forget recording with FX this gives too many that won't match a change in pattern so, all these guitars below can be put on the same track as changes in style/pattern that will be seamless as they will all be using the same FX, even changing from rhythm to soloist Then some intelligence matching can be used to find the substyle/variation for that instrument. I even made up a UserTrack for this very reason Multi Variations UserTracks Feedback ????? [Resolved] but things are very slow around here to catch on. ![[Linked Image - Only viewable when logged in]](https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=download&Number=28059&filename=BB24-Guitar-Types.png)
Last edited by musocity; 06/04/24 07:14 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,309
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,309 |
MC, the reason some resist you is because not everyone uses or likes or needs Reaper, and showing how to do things in Reaper just frustrates those who do not care about reaper. Do whatever you feel like doing post what you want, but you have to admit at least to yourself when you post 20 straight posts on a new thread and NOONE responds it is a clue as to what others think. We don't dismiss your contribution. They are helpful at times. But at your own words you are exhausted from it. So, for your own sake take a break. You say BiaB is way behind the game, but most of us see that it is still light years ahead, and the others are just now starting to catch up. Some new ideas like Logic 11 is cool but it only does so much and will require growth of it's own. Some of your suggestions have played a part in the process, but you are not the ultimate authority on the subject. Every last one of us have played a part, and every last one of us use BiaB, our favorite DAW, pet Apps, useful Plugins in a different way for different reasons. PGM has to take into consideration their entire customer base, and not just those who want to do what you suggest. If i have never said it, thanks for caring about this so much during the years, but please relax and let life happen. PGM will do what they feel is best. Customers can use it as it develops for what they wish or not as needed.
Last edited by Rob Helms; 06/04/24 10:20 AM.
Lenovo Win 10 16 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2024, Realband, Reaper, Harrison Mixbus 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app, Komplete 49 key controller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,847
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,847 |
Rather than having a never-ending database of tens of thousands of styles to weed through, let the customers think more about the instruments that they want to use track by track to create their style.
This would cause a pivot in the Hierarchy with more emphasis on the Instrument and style of playing it (swing/shuffle / tempo / note duration, syncopation, pushes, emphases, in pocket/ahead of pocket) but could greatly improve the process of creating music if done clean and proper. This is an exercise in clean hierarchies with the data they already have. They improve this some in 2024 but skimped on categories/families/type/technique With more serious work on their hierarchies and filtering the correct session player with the correct instrument could be found in a matter of seconds. Top Categories:- Strings - Woodwinds - Brass - Percussion - Keyboards Organize the instrument into category/families Strings: - Autoharp - Banjo - Bass - Bazuki - Cello - Dulcimer - Fiddle - Guitar - Harp - Mandolin - Pedal Steel - Ukulele - Violin - Viola Woodwinds: - Clarinet - Flute - Harmonica - Saxophone Brass: - Horn Section - Trombone - Trumpet - Tuba Keyboards: - Accordion - Organ - Piano - Synth Percussion: - Vibes Vocals: - Vocal DrumsThen organized by subcategory - Guitar - Acoustics - Electric Then organized by subcategory type - Acoustic - Nylon - Steel Then organized by Technique: - Strumming - Fingerpick - Hammer - Mute - Rythm - Solo Then Organize by Tempo, Feel, Note duration EXAMPLE: CAT-----INSTR----TYPE------TECHNIQ----FEEL---DUR----TEMPO- Strings > Guitar > Acoustic > Strumming > Swing > 16th > 120 > Audition and select from a list of 10. Cleaning up and improving filtering/drill down would greatly simplifying the process of getting the right Session player/instrument. As mentioned earlier "auto filling the hierarchy list: for a given "band style" would also dramatically improve the time to creating music.
Studio One (latest version), Win 11 23H2 , i9 -10940X 3.3 GHz, 32GB Mem, a 4K 40" monitor, PreSonus Studio Live III Console as interface/controller. secondarily test on Reaper, Cakewalk, and S1 on Surface Pro 3 Win 10 (latest versions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,226
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,226 |
There is a thing called RDS (Reaper Derangement Syndrome). I use Reaper as my DAW, and love it. So I suspect that I don't have RDS. Because I show Reaper working with Biab content 1000 times better than it can in Biab this is somehow sacrilegious. It works 1000 times better for you and your use cases. But perhaps there are other reasons that people don't want to use BiaB in Reaper. Personally, I prefer to use tools for what they do best. So I'd rather put backing tracks together in BiaB, synth vocal tracks in SynthesizerV, and editing in Reaper. My very limited experience with using embedded tools within DAWs hasn't changed my mind. I've found BiaB and SynthV as VSTis are just not as pleasant (or reliable) to work with as with the desktop versions. Rather than LEARNING from the examples it engenders RDS that blocks all rational thinking and hurts feelings. I hear your frustration. But saying people who aren't jumping on your ideas are akin to triggered snowflake libs isn't going to engender them to your position. There are other, simpler explanations to why people might not be jumping on your solution: - It's not officially supported, and they prefer to use tools that offer support.
- It requires using Reaper, and they don't use Reaper.
- They don't see working as Reaper as an improvement over working in BiaB.
- They don't see the current situation as needing the solution you propose.
Different users have different needs, and none of these possibilities require assuming that anyone is "deranged", lacks "rational thought", or has "hurt feelings". It's old guard loyalty at its best, with others too afraid to speak up as they might be cancelled. And... a reference to cancel culture. Again, you're resorting to name calling. I've been here a while. I'm not sure there are many people who are "too afraid to speak up", and I've not heard anyone complain about being "cancelled". I suggest that real issue isn't anything you've named, but that you haven't tried to understand people who aren't you. Sure, you've got a great solution that solves many of the problems that are important to you. But there's a cost to going to that solution, and there are rational reasons why someone might not want to adopt that solution. To convince people to go to your solution, you'll need to do more than show that it's as good, or even better than their current solution. You'll need to show that it's significantly better in order to get people to adopt that. And I don't think you've been able to convince people, mostly because you don't understand why they aren't adopting your solution. Going back to the UJAM thread - I honestly don't know why you're so excited about the UJAM guitars. To my ear, they're only OK. The naming of the various styles means I won't have a clue what it'll sound like until I try it. And the UI is fine for what it does, but not especially better or worse than the one in NI Session Guitarist or many of the other VI guitars I've got. It's not enough to build a better mousetrap when people are satisfied with "good enough". You're going to make enemies of people who would be your allies if you continue to belittle and insult them, instead of understanding their reluctance, and bridging that gap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,458
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,458 |
There are other, simpler explanations to why people might not be jumping on your solution: - It's not officially supported, and they prefer to use tools that offer support. . . check
- It requires using Reaper, and they don't use Reaper. . . . check
- They don't see working as Reaper as an improvement over working in BiaB. . . check
- They don't see the current situation as needing the solution you propose.
. . . checkDifferent users have different needs, and none of these possibilities require assuming that anyone is "deranged", lacks "rational thought", or has "hurt feelings". And... a reference to cancel culture. Again, you're resorting to name calling. I suggest that real issue isn't anything you've named, but that you haven't tried to understand people who aren't you. Sure, you've got a great solution that solves many of the problems that are important to you. But there's a cost to going to that solution, and there are rational reasons why someone might not want to adopt that solution. To convince people to go to your solution, you'll need to do more than show that it's as good, or even better than their current solution. You'll need to show that it's significantly better in order to get people to adopt that. And I don't think you've been able to convince people, mostly because you don't understand why they aren't adopting your solution. Going back to the UJAM thread - I honestly don't know why you're so excited about the UJAM guitars. To my ear, they're only OK. The naming of the various styles means I won't have a clue what it'll sound like until I try it. And the UI is fine for what it does, but not especially better or worse than the one in NI Session Guitarist or many of the other VI guitars I've got. It's not enough to build a better mousetrap when people are satisfied with "good enough". You're going to make enemies of people who would be your allies if you continue to belittle and insult them, instead of understanding their reluctance, and bridging that gap.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2025 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,278
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,278 |
jpettit,
Nice breakdown.
However I would prefer a simpler family hierarchy tree that ends in "Type"
(CAT-----INSTR----TYPE: List)
(Strings > Guitar > Acoustic: List )
and then use/apply separate filters that are not a part of the tree: feel, tempo(range), etc., but so that they "remember" (respect) prior selection. I believe it's called "nested" sorting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,278
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,278 |
one more +1 for David.
"It requires using Reaper, and they don't use Reaper."
"You're going to make enemies of people who would be your allies if you continue to belittle and insult them, instead of understanding their reluctance, and bridging that gap."
Exactly.
P.S. I started a thread in a wishlist about adding a Reaper thread for musocity. It was somewhat a long shot, but Peter Gannon replied that he is open to idea of DAW threads. I think this might be a multifaceted solution, as most people who use BIAB use DAWs. For one, musocity will find his audience, instead of forcing unrelated Reaper ideas in the threads where only a small percentage of people use Reaper. His ideas are sometimes very creative, but that will not make me switch a DAW of choice and likely other people feel similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows® Today!
If you’ve already purchased Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows®, great news—a new update is now available! This update introduces a handy new feature: a vertical cursor in the Tracks window that shows the current location across all tracks, and more.
Discover everything included in this free update and download it now at https://www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1124
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows®: Boot Camp: The AI Lyrics Generator
With Band-in-a-Box 2025® for Windows®, we've introduced an exciting new feature: the AI Lyrics Generator! In this video, Tobin guides you step-by-step on how to make the most of this new tool.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows®: Boot Camp: The AI Lyrics Generator video.
Check out the forum post for more information.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows®: Using VST3 Plugins
Band-in-a-Box 2025® for Windows® now includes support for VST3 plugins, bringing even more creative possibilities to your music production. Join Simon as he guides you through the process in this easy-to-follow demonstration!
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
Video: Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows: Using The BB Stem Splitter!
In this video, Tobin provides a crash course on using the new BB Stem Splitter feature included in Band-in-a-Box 2025® for Windows®. During this process he also uses the Audio Chord Wizard (ACW) and the new Equalize Tempo feature.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows®: Using the BB Stem Splitter
Check out the forum post for some optional Tips & Tricks!
Congrats to Misha (Rustyspoon)…downloaded/installed a full Audiophile 2025!
Breaking News!
We’re thrilled to announce that Rustyspoon has made PG history as the very first person to successfully complete the download and install of the full Band-in-a-Box 2025 Windows Audiophile Edition (with FLAC files)—a whopping 610GB of data!
A big shoutout to Rustyspoon for stepping up to be our test "elf!"
Thank you for your support, Rustyspoon!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows Videos
With the launch of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows, we're adding new videos to our YouTube channel. We'll also share them here once they are published so you can easily find all the Band-in-a-Box® 2025 and new Add-on videos in one place!
Whether it's a summary of the new features, demonstrations of the 202 new RealTracks, new XPro Styles PAK 8, or Xtra Styles PAKs 18, information on the 2025 49-PAK, or detailed tutorials for other Band-in-a-Box® 2025 features, we have you covered!
Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Videos - we will be updating this post as more videos are added!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Windows is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until December 31, 2024! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Windows 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums65
Topics83,517
Posts758,777
Members39,140
| |
Most Online3,932
Nov 19th, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![[Linked Image - Only viewable when logged in]](https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=download&Number=28058&filename=Logic-Time-Signature.png)
![[Linked Image - Only viewable when logged in]](https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=download&Number=27694&filename=BB24-Frozen-Tracks-RB.png)
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean